Standing stones!

I was at work today near a village in Scotland called Dalmellington and stopped the car to take a phone call from my manager. As I was talking to him I spotted these! I’ve been along this road a few times and never noticed them before, so I was glad he phoned when he did or I’d never have discovered them.

I nipped in to grab some photos – if it hadn’t been during working hours I’d have spent some time just sitting and thinking and enjoyed these stones a bit more. I had time to walk quickly around them, touching each one, and at the middle one I sent a little prayer skywards to our stillborn daughter before taking the pics.

I love places like this – there is something undeniably magical about them and, since my audiobook today was The Kybalion (a book on Hermetic philosophy) it seemed a nice synchronicity to discover something so unexpected in the middle of nowhere.

As it turns out, these aren’t thousands of years old, or even hundreds. They were erected in 1999, but even so, it was a great place to visit.

20150325_130419 20150325_130456 20150325_130510 20150325_130646 20150325_130625

Q&A with Andrew Latham, author

 

Today I’m joined by Professor Andrew Latham. He’s written a few non-fiction books already and is what I’d call a true scholar, but now he’s turned his hand to fiction and his excellent new novel The Holy Lance is just about to be published. I posted my review for that already, but now you can learn a bit more about it in my Q&A with the author.

20121016_mac_andrew_007

Hi Andrew, I’m glad to have you here today! This isn’t your first book, since you’ve previously published non-fiction, correct? How does it feel to be publishing a novel rather than a history book? How do the two compare?

I have to say, it feels great! Any time I have published an academic piece (whether book, article, or book chapter), I have felt a real sense of accomplishment and professional pride. This kind of writing matters – to a small number of people, at least – and a job well done is a job well done. But this is different. In some sense, I have been training my whole life to write academic works. I know how to do it, understand the business, and feel at home in the world of academic publishing. Writing academic works seems natural and, well, work-a-day. Writing this novel, on the other hand, has been something entirely new. Nothing has really prepared me for it. At the outset, I knew next to nothing about writing fiction, did not understand the business, and felt totally at sea in the world of fiction publishing (don’t get me started on the whole agent thing). So, at a minimum, the sense of accomplishment is greater. But I think there’s more to it than that. I really haven’t thought about this until you asked the question, but I think that writing a novel – even if no one actually reads it – is intrinsically more rewarding in that it allows one to create and inhabit a world in ways that the kind of scholarship I do simply cannot. I love my protagonist, Michael Fitz Alan; I like (or loathe) the other historical and fictional characters that populate my novel; I feel deeply invested in the battles that punctuate the narrative; I feel the rhythms of the day as laid out in the Templar Rule; I can taste the watered wine the Templars were allowed a couple of times a day. And I can feel the enchantment of a world governed by cultural matrix of faith rather than science, of God rather than Man (which is not to say I always want to inhabit this world, just visit now and then). These are the sorts of reactions I have to The Holy Lance that I have never had to any of my non-fiction works. So, when you ask how it feels, I say it feels great. Now, don’t get me wrong – I hope it’s a best-seller, receives critical acclaim and wins lots of awards. But even if this is not to be, it feels great to have written it.

holy lance cover

What inspired you to write The Holy Lance? Why this story, in this time period?

Essentially, it was born out of nothing more ambitious than a desire to tell the truth about what Saint Bernard of Clairvaux called the “New Knighthood”, the Knights Templar. In the popular culture, of course, there are three basic narratives about the Templars: they are either odious religious fanatics; cynical secular thugs using religion to camouflage their all-too-worldly real motives; or mystical (and often heretical) keepers of some terrible secret. Turns out, though, that not only are these narratives ultimately silly (although they can be grist for some great entertainment), they are actually far less interesting that the reality of Templar life. Think about it for a moment. On the one hand, Templars, like all medieval knights, were warriors, bred to be brutal and merciless killers. On the other, they were pious monks, committed to a life of prayer and works of charity. How was that possible? How did they reconcile these two personas? And how did they do so in a way that made them the most effective military force in the Latin East? Answering these questions – that is, trying to make sense of the actual reality of Templar life – was what really what inspired me to write the novel.

And what better way to get at these questions than to approach them via one of the oldest stories in human culture – the quest. Basically, The Holy Lance tries to illuminate the reality of the Templar life by chronicling the transformation – through a series of challenges encountered while trying to recover a potent religious relic – of one vicious-if-repentant “worldly knight” into a vicious-but-reformed “New Knight. The story really begins when the protagonist, Michael Fitz Alan, is charged with recovering the long lost Spear of Longinus, a religious relic widely believed to be responsible for the near-miraculous success of the First Crusade. As the narrative unfolds, Fitz Alan must overcome a number of obstacles – you know, the terrain, enemy fighters, treasonous companions, his own shortcomings, that sort of thing. As he attempts to deal with these challenges he often screws up, sometimes erring on the side of being too much the brutal warrior; other times, on the side of being too much the pious monk. Whenever he does fail these tests, however, first of all he puts things right. That is what makes him an archetypal hero. But he also learns from his mistakes. Like all heroes in these quest-type stories, during the course of his journey he has to learn an important lesson – in this case, how to reconcile the two warring elements of his personality, the brutal warrior and the pious monk. In other words, though the trials he faces on his quest, Fitz Alan is transformed into the ultimate Templar knight, a lethal blend of Christian piety and marital prowess.

I should note at this point that none of this is to imply that Fitz Alan’s a saint – like all great military adventure heroes, he most assuredly isn’t. It is, however, to place him in his proper historical context. Fitz Alan isn’t simply a twenty-first century (presumably secular-humanist hero) parachuted into a story set in the twelfth century. Rather, he’s my very best educated guess about what a twelfth century hero would actually look like. As such, like almost all people in medieval Christendom, Fitz Alan understands the world in terms of Christian religious categories and concepts. For the people of Medieval Latin Christendom, these beliefs were neither a symptom of mental illness nor a cynical ideological smokescreen concealing their true motives (power, wealth, glory, pleasure, what have you). Instead, rather like the laws of physics are for us, Christian religious categories and concepts provided the fundamental imaginative matrix through which medieval people made sense of – and thus acted in – the world around them. As I see it, not taking the medieval religious worldview seriously would simply be to get Fitz Alan – and his world — entirely wrong.

Why the quest for a religious relic? A couple of reasons, I suppose. First, the Templars were obsessed with such relics. They truly believed them to be both significant holy objects in their own right and as “force multipliers” that would help them in their battles with the Saracens. Second, after the Holy Grail (which does in fact make a brief appearance in the novel) the Lance was probably the most important relic in all of Christendom. In my judgement, however, every possible permutation of the Grail story has now been done (Monty Python, Dan Brown, Bernard Cornwell, Umberto Eco… the list goes on). This being the case, I thought to myself why not use the next best thing – the Holy Lance? Perhaps if I were a literary theorist, I might also say that I like the way the Lance – the weapon that pierced the side of Christ as he hung of the Cross – symbolically embodies the intermingling of the martial and the religious. But I am merely a humble political scientist and will leave such advanced theorizing to others.

Finally, why the Third Crusade? Again, a couple of reasons. To begin with, the Third Crusade resonates in the popular culture more than any other (with the possible exception of the First). Some combination of the Richard-Saladin relationship and the so-near-yet-so-far nature of the campaign has made this particular campaign remarkably appealing down through the ages. In other words, people just seem to enjoy reading about this crusade. Perhaps more importantly, though, I really wanted a setting that would allow me to draw a sharp contrast between the worldly knight and Saint Bernard’s New Knight. Having the story set in the Third Crusade allowed me to contrast King Richard (the ultimate “worldly knight”) with Michael Fitz Alan (the ultimate “New Knight”) in what I hope are revealing and interesting ways.

893131-003

What research did you have to do for the book? I expect, given your background, this was much easier for you than for most people!

You might think so, but I actually did have to do quite a bit. Having just completed an academic book on war in medieval Europe, of course, I was pretty well-versed in the “big picture” of the crusades. But as I started thinking seriously about writing a novel, I realized that there were some pretty big gaps in my knowledge base. First, I didn’t really know all that much about the Templars. I had no idea, for example, how they were organized, or what they wore, or what they ate, or what the rhythms of their day looked like. Nor did I have any sense of how they were recruited, what the Templar Rule entailed or how it was enforced. Nor, finally, did I have a well-developed understanding of the Templars battle tactics, weapons or other aspects of what in the army we used to call “fieldcraft”. In other words, I had to research all of those fine-grained details of daily life that were utterly irrelevant to the big political issues I had tackled in my recent scholarly book.

Second, after deciding that the Third Crusade was going to be the setting for my novel (for the reasons described above), I realized that I actually knew very little about the details of that particular crusade. Again, I had the strategic big picture nailed down. Richard, Saladin, the crusaders’ multiple unsuccessful bids to take Jerusalem – these sorts of “big picture” things I understood pretty well. But I had only a very shaky grasp of the operational details of what quickly became Richard’s campaign against Saladin. I was almost completely ignorant, for example, of the political and strategic realities that shaped Richard’s actual campaign plan. Similarly, I did not have a firm grasp of the operational ebb and flow of the crusade – the key manoeuvres and decisive battles that ultimately determined its fate. Developing a clear campaign-level picture of the Third Crusade took a surprising amount of time and energy.

Third, I had to do a fair bit of research on King Richard. As I said above, I liked the idea of contrasting Richard with my protagonist, Michael Fitz Alan. Once again, however, as I moved from thinking about writing a novel to actually writing one, I realized that I did not really know enough about King Richard to carry on. And so I had to tackle the literature on one of England’s most written about monarchs. No easy task, let me tell you, as there are many, many good (and even more not-so-good) non-fiction books and documentaries on the Lionheart. And then there are the fictional treatments of him, both in print and on film. I don’t pretend to have covered all the sources, but I certainly covered a lot of them.

Finally, and perhaps surprisingly, I had to do considerable amount of research on how to write a novel. As I’m fond of telling people, although a voracious consumer of fiction, I’m sure the last time I actually produced any was way back in elementary school. I’ve never taken a course in creative writing, nor attended a writers’ workshop nor done anything else that would have prepared me for the serious work of writing a novel. I can write academic non-fiction, of course, but as any scholar-turned-novelist will tell you, that is a completely different craft. So, having decided that I wanted to write a novel, I quickly realized that I didn’t have the foggiest idea about how to do so – and that that was likely be a bit of a problem going forward. Given the nature of my day job, of course, my instinct was to hit the books. And so I spent almost a year reading up on things like plot, characterization, pacing, dialogue, setting, how to write a battle scene – you know, the sorts of things one needs to know how to do if there is to be any hope of writing something people might actually want to read. Probably more helpfully, I also spent a lot of time re-reading several of my favourite authors with a more writerly eye, reverse engineering them as much as possible to see how the masters handled the various elements of historical-fiction writing. The readers will have to decide for themselves if any of this research paid off, but rest assured I did my homework.

893132-004

You have more books planned in the series, right? Any word on what they might be about or when they’ll be published? Do you have any plans to write other novels set in a different period, or even in a different genre?

Yes indeed. This past January I was able to sketch out a pretty detailed outline for the next instalment of what is currently conceived as a trilogy but which may evolve into a longer series. And, once it’s officially summer break, I will begin drafting. The goal is to complete the sequel to The Holy Lance before September and write the final instalment in January/summer of 2016. Whatever happens, I promise Michael Fitz Alan will definitely see the Third Crusade through to its bitter end.

After that, and providing the punters approve, I’ll continue writing historical fiction (can’t see myself venturing beyond that genre, but one never knows). I may keep on with the English Templars – I already have many, many more stories half-developed for this “band of brothers” ready to go – but I may also branch out a bit. The Hundred Years War appeals a very great deal, as does the First World War (I’ve written or taught about both in recent years). We’ll just have to wait and see.

The cover image is striking and should catch the eye but I’m curious – being an indie author I have total control over my covers from the art to the blurb. Did you have any input into any of this with Knox Robinson?

Yes. Here’s how it worked. Knox Robinson (isn’t that a good Scottish name for a publishing firm?) asked me for a few ideas. I gave them three. First, I provided a few pictures of Templar knights from the late 12th century. I was very specific about the period and the order – didn’t want the cover to feature some totally wrong, tin-pot-helmeted late 13th-century Hospitaller. Then I provided a few pics of the Templar battle flag. Again, very careful to get the basics correct (black on top, white on bottom, red cross straddling – that sort of thing). Finally, I gave them a few battle scenes involving Templars. I didn’t really fancy this, but I thought it best to give a wide range of options. The result: a cover that I’m really, really happy with. Simple, striking and symbolic! Couldn’t be more chuffed with how it turned out.

893130-002

What promo stuff will you be doing to get the book out there?

The usual kinds of things, I suppose. My publisher will be doing some promotional things, though I’m not entirely sure what those are. Seems to me that these days even those who go the traditional publishing route are well advised to act as if they were self-published and do everything possible on their own to get the word out. So I’ll be doing book giveaways on Goodreads, guest posts on respected blogs, soliciting good reviews on Amazon, etc. Fortunately for me, the college PR department is arranging some local publicity – so that sort of thing is taken care of. And, if all else fails, I suppose I could simply make it mandatory reading for all of my students.

I like to listen to music when I write, it helps me focus and block out the outside world. Do you listen to music or have anything that helps you get “in the zone”?

Usually, when I write I’m in monastic mode — complete silence, no sensual distractions (coffee, food, etc.). I’m not really very monastic in most of my life, but on reflection, I guess I am when it comes to writing. Total quiet. That’s what I need. Writing this novel, however, I found myself listening now and then to various pieces of medieval and Templar music. There are some great groups out there doing this kind of thing. Personally, I’ve come to love Ensemble Organum. If you want to get in the medieval/Templar mindset, you should to check them out on Youtube.

Click here to hear them

What books do you read yourself to unwind?

So I’m a bit of a freak. When I’m not reading historical fiction, I read… wait for it… history. Medieval political thought, medieval political history, medieval military history. But not just medieval history. I like the history of the two world wars as well. I teach in all these areas, so maybe that’s all there is to it, but I can’t get enough of this stuff – really helps me stay centered.

Any Templar movie recommendations?

This is one of those questions that is best answered in what our medieval forebears called the via negativa (in the opposite way) – that is, by telling you what movies I would not recommend. First, I loathed Kingdom of Heaven, Night of the Temple and The da Vinci Code – all three on the grounds that I found them either totally historically inaccurate in their treatment of the Templars (and/or the crusades) or because they were just plain bad. There are many more, but you get the point. Second, beyond movies, I have detested a variety of Templar-related novels. Sir Walter Scott’s Ivanhoe was pretty good, though not terribly accurate. Beyond that, though, there’s not much. Eco’s Foucault’s Pendulum is just plain wrong, as is Raymond Khoury’s The Last Templar (also a movie). And I’m afraid it’s downhill from there. There are some notable exceptions, of course. Robyn Young’s Bretheren Trilogy comes to mind (fantastical in its treatment of the Templars, but I like the way she writes). But generally speaking, there are few works of fiction that really capture the realities of Templar life.

On the positive side, there really is only one piece of popular culture that I have found (mostly) accurate and (largely) compelling – Arn! In movie form, this is a beautifully filmed, truly compelling Templar story. One of the few downsides is the portrayal of Saladin (again, just plain wrong – at least according to Muslim contemporaries). Otherwise, though, I highly recommend it.

But wait, Steven, there’s a little bit extra just for you. Two Templar-related metal bands I have found. The first is Grave Digger, a German band that has produced a Templar concept album entitled Knights of the Cross. The second is Hammer Fall, a Swedish Power Metal Band who refer to themselves as “The Templars of Heavy Metal”. If you haven’t yet encountered these, I hope you find them as enjoyable as I have doing this interview.

Cheers, mate!

freemasons-3

 

Cheers, Andrew, and thank you for your time. I have to say, I was surprised to find myself enjoying The DaVinci Code movie, perhaps because I already knew all about the back-story before Dan Brown turned it into such a mega-selling novel. Arn, I have to agree, is fantastic – I own it on Bluray, the only movie I’ve ever watched with subtitles I think!

 

You can find out more about The Holy Lance at the Knox Robinson website which also has links to buy this fantastic book. Don’t miss out, it’s a cracking read!

Lady of the Eternal City by Kate Quinn – review

Review – Lady of the Eternal City

by Kate Quinn

This is not my usual sort of book. In fact, I’d go as far to say I’ve never read a book like this before, simply because I wouldn’t choose it myself at the library or book shop (I was sent an Advance Review Copy by the author because I’d enjoyed one of her previous works). I am very set in my ways when it comes to entertainment – I don’t watch horror movies, I don’t listen to pop music and, when it comes to novels, I like a lot of action. While there is some action here, the novel is centred around the relationships of the main characters, with Emperor Hadrian, his wife Empress Sabina, grizzled old soldier Vercingetorix and Hadrian’s (male) lover Antinous.

lady of eternal cover

It’s a very long book and the thing I enjoyed most was the fact that I felt like I was learning a lot about this period of Roman history (I didn’t know much at all before this). It’s all told in such an interesting way, though, that you’re happy to be learning while engaging with the characters and their tangled, irrevocably intertwined fates.

As with any good book you will be rooting for your favourites while hoping that the “baddies” get what’s coming to them and, for the most part, you’ll be glad to see just that happening. However, Emperor Hadrian himself proves to be an extremely complex individual – I feared we were just dealing with a cliched, blacker-than-black murderous lunatic but I was wrong. I won’t spoil things but by the end of the book you realise each and every one of these people, particularly Hadrian, were just humans like you or I, with hopes and dreams and a dark side as well as a good side.

I felt sorry for all of them because they suffer so much but the end of the book leaves some room for hope, rather like the previous book of Kate’s that I read, A Day of Fire.

Overall, I have to be honest, I could have done with more people getting their teeth punched out – the most important relationship in my usual reading is the one between a hairy-arsed barbarian’s sword and his enemy’s face! But, as I say, Lady of the Eternal City is a long book and, when you have limited time to read as I do, the fact I enjoyed it enough to finish it speaks volumes for the skill of the writing and the strength of the story.

If you fancy a change of pace from endless brutality but still want a trip to ancient Rome then you should definitely pick this one up, I don’t think you’ll be disappointed!

Find out more in the Q&A I did with the author here.

Buy Kate’s Books

Twitter | Website and Blog | Goodreads | Facebook

Kate Quinn “Lady of the Eternal City” Q&A

Today I’m pleased to introduce author Kate Quinn, who’s just released her new book, Lady of the Eternal City (my review of it will appear on Monday so look out for it!).

National bestselling author Kate Quinn returns with the long-awaited fourth volume in the Empress of Rome series, an unforgettable new tale of the politics, power, and passion that defined ancient Rome.

Elegant, secretive Sabina may be Empress of Rome, but she still stands poised on a knife’s edge. She must keep the peace between two deadly enemies: her husband Hadrian, Rome’s brilliant and sinister Emperor; and battered warrior Vix, who is her first love. But Sabina is guardian of a deadly secret: Vix’s beautiful son Antinous has become the Emperor’s latest obsession.

Empress and Emperor, father and son will spin in a deadly dance of passion, betrayal, conspiracy, and war. As tragedy sends Hadrian spiraling into madness, Vix and Sabina form a last desperate pact to save the Empire. But ultimately, the fate of Rome lies with an untried girl, a spirited redhead who may just be the next Lady of the Eternal City . . .

kate quinn

Hi Kate, thanks for chatting with me today. First of all, it’s a huge book! How long did it take you to write it?

Maybe a year? It’s all a blur. This was originally intended to be part and parcel of “Empress of the Seven Hills,” which covers the reign of Emperor Hadrian’s predecessor, Trajan. But I realized that there was no way so much history was going to fit in one book. Hadrian’s half of the history barely fit into this book.

The historical aspects are extremely impressive and are woven into the story with great skill so it doesn’t feel like a lecture. How much research did you have to do? What part of that did you enjoy the most?

I researched obsessively, Anthony Everitt’s superb biography of Hadrian being my primary Bible—I wore it to tatters like a child’s security blanket. Researching Hadrian’s reign was fun because of just how many dramatic real-life events happened to him: action-packed lion hunts, mysterious prophecies, assassination attempts, epic love affairs, nearly being struck by lightning while making sacrifice to the thunder god—I made none of those things up.

That brings me nicely to my next question: how much of the book is based on historical fact? Did you embellish much or add anything to make it a better story?

I flexed the ages of my younger characters to fit the story better—we have no birth date recorded for Annia Galeria Faustina the Younger, so I edged her birth up some years to suit the story, and I edged Marcus Aurelius back a bit to keep him more contemporary with her. Vix, my fictional Praetorian, is a composite of several real historical figures: Marcius Turbo whose incredible military career launched him from common legionary to Hadrian’s right-hand man, and his fellow Prefect who was fired for being “overly intimate” with Hadrian’s wife. What I did most often was fill in the spaces behind the (sometimes very sparse) facts. We know Empress Sabina was “overly intimate” with her Praetorian, but we don’t know what that meant or what really happened. Likewise, we know very little about the early years of Jewish rebel leader Simon Bar Kokhba. In both places, I let my imagination fill in the gaps.

Which character did you enjoy writing the most? Do you get attached to them and feel sad if anything bad happened?

I was very fond of Antinous, he of the beautiful face and the equally beautiful soul. He was a late addition to the book as a viewpoint character; I realized with the help of my critique partners that the story needed his voice, and I realized this about 6 weeks from my deadline. So I wrote all his scenes at once at a white heat, inserting them where they were needed, and his voice was warm and immediate in my head. Which hurt because from the very beginning, since I knew what was in store for the historical Antinous—and I grieved for him.

You did a good job with Hadrian who, at first, I thought was just going to be a complete loon but you gave him a lot of depth and it really made for a better read.

Thanks! Hadrian was a puzzling character, the most contradictory and frustrating historical figure I’ve ever researched. He’s like a handful of water to pin down; almost every character trait he had was bracketed by its direct opposite. He was a blood-lover with a merciful streak; a sybarite who loved roughing it; a religious cynic; a superstitious man of science; a military man and a classical scholar. I nearly tore out my hair trying to pinpoint his character, and I still have no idea if my version is any closer to the truth than anyone else’s!

lady of eternal cover

I must admit I was a little surprised at the Romans’ negative attitude towards homosexuality, given their love of Greek culture with its iconic figures like Alexander the Great. Indeed, Hadrian’s relationship with Antinous seems to mirror that of Alexander and Hephaistion.

Roman sexual mores seems homophobia-free at first look, but that isn’t really the case. Two men could only bed down respectably if one of them was either a slave, or if of the same social class, a teenage boy. Once Antinous passed into his twenties (which I conjecture he did, since his statues all show a mature young man and not a weedy teenager) he would have been held up to public scorn for taking the woman’s role in a relationship, even if that relationship was with the Emperor. And Hadrian was condemned as well, because his passion for Antinous crossed the bounds of what was considered seemly. Roman manhood stressed the need for gravitas and emotional restraint—for an emperor to show such uninhibited public passion for a concubine (of either sex) was seen as an embarrassment.

I couldn’t help noticing Annia was quite similar to another character from recent literature whose name also starts and end with an ‘A’… Did you have that in mind at all when you were writing?

No, but the comparison delights me because I’m a huge “Game of Thrones” fan, and I love Arya Stark. It’s hard to find a way to make a historical heroine a badass, given all the constraints on female behavior, but with the craze during Hadrian’s reign for all things Greek, I found a way for Annia to be a runner like the famed women of Sparta.

I first read your work in A Day of Fire which was a quite exceptional book. Ben Kane was one of your co-authors on that – do you have any plans to visit Hadrian’s Wall in period correct Roman garb with Ben in any future Romani Walks of his?

I’d snap up the offer in a heartbeat, since I do my best thinking on long walks. But what is correct period Roman garb for a Roman girl walking the wall? I’m no marathoner like Annia, and if I travel in the period style of any of my Empresses, I’ll need a litter and six strapping litter-bearers.

Not sure if Ben, Anthony Riches and Russell Whitfield (the other authors that did the Romani Walk in aid of Médecins Sans Frontières and Combat Stress) would be up for that to be honest! How is A Day of Fire doing though? I see it’s been shortlisted as one of the best indie books of 2014 in the forthcoming Historical Novel Society conference which must be a huge buzz for you.

It was! We’re all delighted. Thinking about doing another collaboration; we’ll see what happens.

What’s next for you? More historical fiction? Do you have any plans to try a different genre or a completely different time period?

I’ve already done a two-book branch-out into Renaissance Italy, with a duology about the Borgia family. I’ve got other ideas, maybe even something 20th century, but nothing’s certain yet!

Brilliant answers, thank you again for this Kate.

Now, check back here on Monday for my review of Lady of the Eternal City. In the meantime, you can find out more (or buy it!) here:

Buy LADY OF THE ETERNAL CITY

Barnes & Noble | Amazon | Indiebound | Books A Million | Book Depository

The WOLF’S HEAD Jackson Rhoads!

You all know I’m a huge heavy metal fan and I love my collection of Jackson guitars so…Say hello to the Jackson “WOLF’S HEAD” Rhoads! 24 frets, Bill Lawrence USA 500XL bridge pickup (think Dimebag Darrell from Pantera) and neck-through construction. This thing is as sharp as the arrows on my book covers and almost as deadly!

I commissioned the guys at morevisual.me (my cover designers) to produce the decal for this and it looks great!

20150304_214128

20150304_214112

I haven’t recorded anything with this guitar yet, but if you want to hear an Iron Maiden-influenced song of mine, I used “Nocturnal Fire” as the soundtrack for The Wolf and the Raven trailer here:

Medieval outlaws (other than Robin Hood!)

Here’s a short piece I did for the English Historical Fiction Authors website, take a look! I even manage to mention Judge Dredd and Batman… ;-)

http://englishhistoryauthors.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/medieval-outlaws.html

Review of W&R by San Francisco Book Review

Very nice review of The Wolf and the Raven. It’s a little bit different to the usual reviews, I enjoyed reading it!  I will be doing an interview with them too (an actual recorded interview you can listen to) so watch out for that.

Take a look at the review here:

sanfranciscobookreview_logo_90

“The important point is that this is a story that can and will be enjoyed by all ages, as all good myths (did I say myths?) should.” -SF Book Review